Bureaucratic discretion, legitimacy, and substantive justice

نویسندگان

چکیده

Chiara Cordelli’s book The Privatized State makes an important contribution to debates over the morality of public administration and widespread privatization. Cordelli argues that privatization is a problem legitimacy, as private actors impose their will unilaterally on others. Bureaucratic decision-making, by contrast, can be legitimate, within correct institutional context in accordance with bureaucratic ethos. In this review, I argue policymaking faces similar changes from value legitimacy raises against First, for polity subject self-ruling, bureaucracies must incorporate more democracy; but, so doing goes rationale form. Second, bureaucrats acting behalf state do not have starkly different levels free purposiveness, it morally desirable purposiveness than allows, less.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Slackers and Zealots: Civil Service, Policy Discretion, and Bureaucratic Expertise∗

In this paper we investigate how “civil service” systems of public personnel management interact with bureaucratic discretion to create expert bureaucracies populated by policy-motivated agents. We build a model in which bureaucrats may invest in (relationship specific) policy expertise, and may be either policy-motivated or policy-indifferent. We argue that under specific conditions on the nat...

متن کامل

Justice , Trust and Institutional Legitimacy

This paper summarising ‘procedural justice’ approaches to policing, contrasting these to the more politically dominant discourse about policing as crime control. It argues that public trust in policing is needed partly because this may result in public cooperation with justice, but more importantly because public trust in justice builds institutional legitimacy and thus public compliance with t...

متن کامل

Bureaucratic Justice : an Early Warning *

To accommodate the staggering increase in federal litigation that has occurred in recent years, the federal judicial process has been gradually, but significantly, transformed. The number of federal judges has dramatically increased at both the trial and appellate levels.' The number of law clerks and "staff attorneys" employed in the courts of appeals also has grown dramatically.2 Moreover, an...

متن کامل

Conceptualizing justice and evaluating substantive justice in urban development plans: Explication of criteria and suggesting strategies

The aim of this article is to formulate principles and criteria that help us in justice-based evaluation of urban development plansand modification of them to achive urban justice. this research is based on the research review methodology, as well as content analysis of urban development plans of the US and the UK. in this article, to proposed six general criteria for formulating the conceptual...

متن کامل

Substantive trial in The Administrative Justice Tribunal

In the new regulations of Administrative Justice Tribunal, substantive proceedings were also brought in the proceedings, which are the innovations of the Code of the Organization and the Rules of Procedure of the Administrative Justice Tribunal. The new lawmaking approach in the new law is the possibility of the complete administrative litigation in Administrative Justice Tribunal, which requir...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1369-8230', '1743-8772']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2133829